![]() |
University of FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN 2005 – 2010 November 1, 2004 |
![]() |
|
Vision Statement: To be a distinguished, nationally competitive, teaching/research balanced institution of advanced learning. The university provides intellectual leadership for the educational, cultural, and economic development of the region and state through its instructional, research, and service activities, which include programs that attain national and international recognition. Graduate study and research are integral to the university’s purpose. Doctoral programs will continue to focus on fields of study in which UL Lafayette has the ability to achieve national competitiveness and/or to respond to specific state/regional need. The UL Lafayette is categorized as a SREB Four-Year 2 institution, as a Carnegie Doctoral/Research-Intensive University, and as a COC/SACS Level VI institution. UL Lafayette is committed to graduate education through the doctorate, will conduct research appropriate to the level of academic programs offered, and will have a defined ratio of undergraduate to graduate enrollment. Philosophy Statement: To attain the mission of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette through the optimal and collegial deployment of the agency’s human, intellectual and fiscal resources; to subscribe to proactive, consistent, sound decision-making practices; and to maintain relevance and accountability in all processes and procedures, thereby building and sustaining student, faculty, staff, stakeholder, and public confidence. UL Lafayette is committed to promoting social mobility and equality of opportunity. The university extends its resources to diverse constituency groups it serves through research centers, continuing education, public outreach programs, cultural activities, and access to campus facilities. Because of its location in the heart of South Louisiana, UL Lafayette will continue its leadership role in sustaining instruction and research programs that preserve Contact Person: Harry J Hebert, Sr. Director Institutional Research PO Drawer 41732 Lafayette, LA 70506-1732 Phone: 337-482-6863E-Mail: InstRes@louisiana.edu |
||
|
|
||
|
Goals and Objectives: I. Goal: Increase Opportunities for Student Access and Success. Objective I.1: Increase fall 14th day headcount enrollment at the Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy I.1.1: Work with high school counselors to provide information to students and parents about programs and financial support in the Strategy I.1.2: Continue development of articulation and support agreements with SLCC and LSUE. Strategy I.1.3: Increase funding for scholarships especially in areas targeted by state. Strategy I.1.4: Improve response time/information flow to students and parent inquiries. Performance Indicators: Output: Number of students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at the Outcome: Percent change in the number of students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at the Source: Official 14th day file created from the University’s Student Information System Objective I.2: Increase minority fall headcount enrollment (as of the 14th class day) at the Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy I.2.1: Continue work with middle school and high school counselors of schools with high minority populations to provide information to students and parents about programs and financial support. Strategy I.2.2: Continue development of articulation and support agreements with SLCC and LSUE. Strategy I.2.3: Increase funding of scholarships especially in areas targeted by state. Strategy I.2.4: Improve response time/information flow to student and parent inquiries. Strategy I.2.5: Increase minority faculty hires. Strategy I.2.6: Continue support for TRIO programs for minority population. Performance Indicators: Output: Number of minority students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at the Outcome: Percent change in the number of minority students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at the University of Source: Official 14th day file created from the University’s Student Information System II. Goal: Ensure Quality and Accountability. Objective II.1: Increase the percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to second year in public postsecondary education by 4.2 percentage points from the fall, 2003 baseline level of 80.8% to 85% by fall, 2009. Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy II.1.1: Continue strengthening of admissions requirements. Strategy II.1.2: Investigate reasons for academically eligible students not returning. Strategy II.1.3: Improve academic advising and academic support information and services. Strategy II.1.4: Improve retention programs specifically designed for freshmen. Performance Indicators: Output: Percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education (total retention). Outcome: Percentage point change in the percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education (total retention). Output: Percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year at the Outcome: Percentage point change in the percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year at the Source: Board of Regents SPSRETN Objective II.2: Increase the six-year graduation rate in postsecondary education by 10 percentage points from the fall, 2003 baseline level of 34.8 to 44.8 by spring, 2009. Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy II.2.1: Continue strengthening of admissions requirements. Strategy II.2.2: Investigate reasons for academically eligible students not returning. Strategy II.2.3: Improve academic advising and academic support information and services. Performance Indicators: Output: Percentage of students, identified in a first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort, graduating within six years from a public postsecondary education institution. Outcome: Percentage point change in the graduation rate for students, identified in a first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort, graduating within six years from a public postsecondary education institution. Source: Board of Regents JOHNRPT91 III. Goal: Enhance University research capabilities and national reputation to increase research and development funding while utilizing the Governor’s Information Technology Initiative to help create an environment that spurs the development, growth and attraction of businesses capable of succeeding and flourishing within the rapidly emerging Information Age. Objective III.1: Increase the number of patents registered and copyrights applied for by UL Lafayette researchers by 40% from the 2003-2004 baseline number of 25 to 35 in 2009-2010. Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy III.1.1: Provide university researchers workshops, materials and support to educate on the disclosure, development and commercialization of intellectual properties. Strategy III.1.2: Establish new research centers and sustain current ones through interaction with private companies. Strategy III.1.3: Plan for, build, and eventually implement a Center for immersive visualization that would support relevant research activities on campus, at other universities, and by private industry. Performance Indicators: Output: Number of patents registered and copyrights applied for. Outcome: Percentage of change in number of patents registered and copyrights applied for. Source: UL Lafayette Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Objective III.2: Create two new information technology related businesses or business relocations to Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy III.2.1: Provide university researchers workshops, materials and support to educate on the disclosure, development and commercialization of intellectual properties. Strategy III.2.2: Establish new research centers and sustain current ones through interaction with private companies. Strategy III.2.3: Plan for, build, and eventually implement a Center for immersive visualization that would support relevant research activities on campus, at other universities, and by private industry. Performance Indicators: Outcome: Number of new businesses created or new businesses relocated to Source: UL Lafayette Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Objective III.3: Collaborate with existing businesses to increase commercialization of new information technology related intellectual properties by 66.7% from the 2003-2004 baseline of 6 to 10 by 2009-2010. Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy III.3.1: Provide university researchers workshops, materials and support to educate on the disclosure, development and commercialization of intellectual properties. Strategy III.3.2: Establish new research centers and sustain current ones through interaction with private companies. Strategy III.3.3: Plan for, build, and eventually implement a Center for immersive visualization that would support relevant research activities on campus, at other universities, and by private industry. Strategy III.3.4: Plan for and eventually build a new computer science building to support IT research and related economic development supporting activities. Performance Indicators: Output: Number of collaborations for the commercialization of new information technology related intellectual properties as a result of UL Lafayette IT research and development efforts. Outcome: Percentage of change in number of collaborations for the commercialization of new information technology related intellectual properties as a result of UL Lafayette IT research and development efforts. Source: UL Lafayette Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Objective III.4: Increase the amount of externally sponsored research and sponsored program funding awarded to the University by 25% from the 2003-2004 baseline amount of $36,395,955 to $45,130,983 in 2009-2010. Links: Children’s Budget Link: Not applicable Human Resource Policies Beneficial to Women and Families Link: Not applicable Other Links: Board of Regents Master Plan for Higher Education Strategy III.4.1: Provide university researchers workshops, materials and support to educate on the disclosure, development and commercialization of intellectual properties. Strategy III.4.2: Establish new research centers and sustain current ones through interaction with private companies. Strategy III.4.3: Plan for, build, and eventually implement a Center for immersive visualization that would support relevant research activities on campus, at other universities, and by private industry. Strategy III.4.4: Plan for and eventually build a new computer science building to support IT research and related economic development supporting activities. Performance Indicators: Output: Yearly amount of externally sponsored research and sponsored program funding. Outcome: Percentage of change in externally sponsored research and sponsored program funding. Source: UL Lafayette Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Appendix A Process Documentation I. A brief statement identifying the principal clients and users of each program and the specific service or benefit derived by such persons or organizations: By designing and implementing programs of higher education, the University's clients include all the citizens in II. An identification of potential external factors that are beyond the control of the entity and that could significantly affect the achievement of its goals or objectives: A list of external factors that are beyond the control of the 1. The Administration The current administration is very supportive of higher education’s goals and objectives. The support for postsecondary education in general has been laudable. However, the governor of 2. The Economy At present, 3. The Federal Government A significant amount of revenue flows from III. The statutory requirement or other authority for each goal of the plan: I. Goal: Increase Opportunities for Student Access and Success. 1. Constitution (Article VIII. Section 5 (D) 4) – To formulate and make timely revision of a master plan. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. II. Goal: Ensure Quality and Accountability. 1. Constitution (Article VIII, Section 5 (D) 4) – To formulate and make timely revision of a master plan. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. 2. Constitution (Article VIII, Section 5 (D) 1, 2) – To revise or eliminate existing academic programs and to approve or disapprove new program proposals. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. 3. Constitution (Article VIII, Section 5 (D) 3) – To study the need for new institutions or change in mission of existing institutions. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. IV. A description of any program evaluation used to develop objectives and strategies. The Board of Regents is required by the state constitution to develop and make timely revision of a master plan for higher education. The goals and objectives in this five-year strategic plan were derived from the Regents’ revised Master Plan, which was adopted by the Board of Regents in March 2001. The development of the Master Plan included multi-constituent task forces and study groups, the use of consultants, and public hearings. A core set of objectives was agreed upon and adopted by the systems of postsecondary education Strategy Analysis Checklist Analysis __X__ Cost/benefit analysis conducted (Under discussion with BoR and OPB) __√__ Financial or performance audit used (All performance and finance audit indicators have been fulfilled) __X__ Benchmarking for best management practices used (Under discussion with BoR and OPB) __X__ Act 160 Reports used __√__ Other analysis or evaluation tools used __√__ Impact on other strategies considered __√__ Stakeholders identified and involved Authorization __√__ Authorization exists __X__ Authorization needed Organization Capacity __X__ Needed structural or procedural changes identified (No structural or procedural changes needed) __X__ Resource needs identified __√__ Strategies developed to implement needed changes or address resource needs (Strategies have been developed to address goals and objectives) __√__ Responsibility assigned Time Frame __√__ Already ongoing __√__ New, startup date estimated __√__ Lifetime of strategy identified Fiscal Impact __X__ Impact on operating budget __X__ Impact on capital outlay budget __X__ Means of finance identified __X__ Return on investment determined to be favorable The budget is not tied to performance objectives in higher education. The V. Identification of the primary persons who will benefit from or be significantly affected by each objective within the plan. Objective I.1 Students, parents, faculty, and staff within and outside the service areas of the University Objective I.2 Students, parents, faculty, and staff within and outside the service areas of the University Objective II.1 Students, employers, citizenry of the state Objective II.2 Students, employers, citizenry of the state VI. An explanation of how duplication of effort will be avoided when the operations of more than one program are directed at achieving a single goal, objective, or strategy. For the purposes of Act 1465 of 1997, the VII. Documentation as to the validity, reliability, and appropriateness of each performance indicator, as well as the method used to verify and validate the performance indicators as relevant measures of each program’s performance. See Performance Indicator Documentation attached for each performance indicator. VIII. A description of how each performance indicator is used in management decision making and other agency processes. See Performance Indicator Documentation attached for each performance indicator.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Document last revised:
April 14, 2005
© Copyright 2005 by the University of Louisiana at Lafayette Institutional Research, P.O. Box 41732, Lafayette LA 70504 Phone: 337/482-6863 · E-Mail: instres@louisiana.edu |
||